Shareable · Sample content pack

Did content changes move citations and clicks?

Illustrative sample: invented sites, real grading rules

Only content changes (titles, meta descriptions, structured data, copy and llms.txt) that shipped and were graded on AI citations, impressions or clicks. Did making the content easier to cite actually move the number?

Sample content pack · content → visibility

Content shipped → citation/visibility delta

2 proofs · 50% win rate

Each card is a shipped content change with a graded before and after on a citation or search visibility metric.

Instrument-backed
2 (W1/L0/F1)
Citation proofs
0

Blog · 2

  • winBlogcontent · impressions

    Brightloop Fitness

    Merge three thin rest-day posts into one long guide and redirect the old URLs

    content-shipped (blog/content) → impressions 5210 → 7360 (+41.3%) verified 2026-07-20 · Δ +41.3%

    surface /blog/rest-days · Share card →

  • flatBlogtitle · clicks

    Quillstone Notes

    Retitle the meeting-notes post around the search phrase; clicks barely moved

    content-shipped (blog/title) → clicks 31 → 32 (+3.2%) verified 2026-07-28 · Δ +3.2%

    surface /blog/meeting-notes · Share card →

Canonical: growthradar.app/wins/pack

Agent feed: growthradar.app/wins/pack.json

Canonical URL: growthradar.app/wins/pack

Free while early access. Paid plans TBD.

Join the waitlist
Content changes graded on AI citations and search